Taking Sides:
Is it more unethical to allow threats to students/schools, or to deny students/teachers access to instructionally-relevant Web-based tools and content?
This question is being raised for educators throughout America, and many teachers are taking sides as to which they believe is more important and ethical. I've been asked to think about this question, and have done some research as well as used personal experience to take a position.
I believe that it is important to make sure teachers and students are not faced with internet threats while discovering the web, but in my opinion there is way too much blocking by the school districts. With anything on the internet these days, if there's a will there's a way and hackers, viruses, and objectionable content is going to happen in some sense. But keeping students and teachers from using valuable resources on the web by blocking such content is hindering the educational field. I find that if we are choosing to use the internet in the classroom, we should allow students to explore with a teacher's eye observing and guiding the students to the content of the topic. Many students do not have access at home to a computer still these days, and the ones that do mostly use it for computer games and social networking, and do not always use the computer for educational purpose to explore. Blogs and some websites have so much useful information for students to learn and take in that they may not get from anywhere else. I myself have run into this problem when working with students in the classroom. I have wanted to show videos that refer to the topic we were working on such as videos from youtube or speeches that important people have made, and I was unable to show them due to the school's blocked features.
In an article I found, author Chuck Kinzer states, "I would be remiss if I did not mention that the use of filtering software and restricted sites that prescreen content is under debate. Advocates of free speech point out the potential threats of censorship they pose. Others note that many appropriate and beneficial sites can be mistakenly filtered out. Teachers should be aware of the options available to address issues of Internet safety so they can make informed, professional, and educationally sound judgments for their own situations". I love what Kinzer had to say in his journal article because he discussed both sides of the topic and gave insight into each view of the argument. I believe what he says here is very true.
All in all, I have found this discussion to be a very interesting subject of debate and I am looking forward to reading more about this and how to make sure I can do my best to be an advocate for the allowance of students/teachers to access the "blocked" material in the classroom.
Resources:
Gunter, G. A., Gunter, R. E., & Shelly, G.B. (2010). Integrating technology and digital media in the classroom (6th ed.). United States: Course Technology, Cengage Learning.
Kinzer, C. (2000/2001, December/January). Addressing issues of Internet safety [an Electronic Classroom Web watch]. Reading Online, 4(6).
Available:\http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=/electronic/webwatch/safety/index.html